Obelisk: Materials
Materials
If you want knowledge to persist, materials matter as much as the message.
This isn’t a shopping list — it’s a set of constraints.
Principles
- Prefer what erodes slowly
- Prefer what fails gracefully (partial readability)
- Prefer what’s inspectable without tools
- Assume water, heat, freeze/thaw, wind, vandalism
Candidate mediums
Stone (baseline)
- Pros: time-tested durability, readable after centuries.
- Cons: expensive to work at scale; heavy; location-specific.
Fired ceramic / porcelain
- Pros: very durable, high detail, chemically stable.
- Cons: brittle; impact damage.
Stainless / titanium plates
- Pros: precise engraving; high information density.
- Cons: corrosion in harsh environments; theft risk; requires tooling to fabricate.
Placement strategy
- Redundancy across sites beats one “perfect” site.
- Put copies where people naturally shelter: caves, overhangs, old foundations.
- Use geography: avoid flood plains; avoid soft rock; avoid unstable slopes.
Survivability checklist
- Can a reader still extract value if 30% is missing?
- If the site is buried, will it remain readable when uncovered?
- If the surface is vandalized, is there a protected inner layer?